karenthepasolibrarian

Small town public library life and library school topics of interest

Literature Review: College Bound Teens

Leave a comment

Although it was not required to include this assignment as a blog posting, and although this is no longer formatted properly, I am finding it to be useful to have everything I write for class in one location.

College Bound Teens: A Literature Review

LIBR 200: Information Communities

Karen Christiansen

Ms. Ellen Greenblatt

San José State University

Fall, 2014

Introduction

In my twenty-eight years of working as a librarian for the City of Paso Robles, I have taken pride in greatly improving service to our teen population. When I first began working in the Carnegie Library in the middle of the City Park, the teen fiction section of the library consisted of one sad range of hardback books, most of which appeared to be written in the 1970’s. Flash forward to today, our library is located in a beautiful modern facility, and we have a teen area that, although being awkwardly located, has more than doubled in size, containing fiction titles mostly written in the last ten years. I created our Graphics collection which is housed near the teen fiction section. We also now offer teen programming, including our popular Teen Summer Reading Program which I started in 2006, and a Summer Teen Volunteer Program which is an offshoot of “Club Teen,” a teen advisory board of sorts that I established in an effort to increase the teen presence in the library. Although I feel that I have made our library a welcoming place for teens, the facility is still not heavily used by teens, nor do our teen programs have high attendance. I believe that by researching this age group, particularly college bound teens, I will be able to get some new ideas for communicating our offerings to teens and inspire them to use the library more.

Review of Writings

Researching teens’ information behavior has proven to be something of a challenge as there is not a wealth of scholarly work on this topic. While there is quite a bit of information available on the information behavior of adults or children, there has been only “limited attention to adolescents.” (Agosto, 2011, Abstract, para. 1). Shari Lee (2014) also remarks on the “dearth of research that examines public library services to teens” (Abstract, para. 1) and also the mediocre quality of “several recently published books about teen library services” (Abstract, para. 1). Fortunately, there are professional organizations that focus on the state of public library service to teens, namely the Public Library Association (PLA) and the Young Adult Library Services Association (YALSA). YALSA in particular has high-quality practical suggestions for inspiring teens to participate more frequently in their public library.

For the purposes of my research, I looked for a broad overview of teen information seeking, information about rural dwellers’ information searching and needs, how online resources are being used, and how the concept of library-as-place plays out when providing service to teens. The few scholarly resources I located were authored by professors in the field of Library and Information Science, with Denise Agosto being the preeminent source. YALSA provides a professional venue for Young Adult Librarians and other library staff to discuss various examples of what worked for them when serving teens. The PEW Research Center had current applicable data that is relevant as well. All the studies that led to the available research on teen library use were based on surveys and interviews with surprisingly small populations of students. Novotny’s (2004) protocol analysis study of online catalog usage was based on the information provided by eighteen students (p. 527), Becker’s (2009) study surveyed 47 students (p. 341), Harlan (2012) had a mere seven students in her study (p. 572), and even Agosto (2005) only interviewed 27 students in her seminal study of urban youth (p. 141).  Of the sources I consulted, only the PEW Research Center (2014) study consulted a large number of subjects, 6224, although admittedly these were subjects aged 16-29 (p. 5). The 2012 PLA Public Library Data Service survey received information from 1832 libraries (19% of public libraries in the United States and Canada), but this was data from librarians rather than from the teens themselves (Agosto, 2013, General findings, para. 1). For my own research, I hope to collect data from a larger population of local teens.

When researching general teen information seeking behavior, several commonalities are presented. The first of these is that teens use a wide variety of sources when seeking information including people they know, online sources, and television. Agosto (2005) notes that teenagers “identified people as their preferred information source,” (p. 162) but found that teens have “widespread negative perceptions of libraries and librarians,” (p. 161) so librarians are not likely to be consulted by information-seeking teens. This is further proven when we look at teen brain development as related by Evans (2014) who describes teen information seeking as a “need to use different pathways to completely different parts of the brain (from the underdeveloped frontal lobe cortex) when they react, decide, and interpret” (p. 12). By 2009, Becker found in his study that teens “unanimously chose Google” (p. 341) as their favorite source of information; this is perhaps indicative of the popularity of smart phones. Adding to teen use of technology is Bilal’s (as cited in Dresang, 2005) finding that “overall, children did not explore text-only sites often; (they) preferred sites with high visual content and short, simple textual content, and liked to see more animation and interactivity in the Internet” (p. 183). Even students in rural areas, who may have less access to technology, “used a variety of tools to create content” (Harlan, 2012, p. 572).

“Ease of use” is another common theme found in the literature about teen information behavior. In his article, “I Don’t Think, I Click,” Eric Novotny (2004) found that college student users of online public access catalogs (OPACs) searched at a rather rudimentary level, sticking “with phrases” (p. 528) and foregoing the use of Boolean searching and even the use of synonyms (p.529), coming to the conclusion that OPACs need to be designed to operate more in the manner of popular websites such as Amazon (p. 533). Becker (2009) remembers back to his own teenaged years when he consulted the almanac for information because “it was fast, easy to use, and at (his) fingertips,” (p. 342) demonstrating that “ease of use” is not a new concept. Cellular phones are the teens’ go-to media of choice because, according to Agosto (2005), they offer “the most convenient method of finding answers to their questions” (p. 150).

One area where the research demonstrated differing conclusions is in the perception of libraries as viewed by teens. In her 2005 study, Agosto found that libraries were seen as “dirty, unwelcoming, and unexciting” (p. 151) and teens rarely consulted librarians “because of negative past experiences” (p. 154). Islam and Ahmed (2012), when studying world-wide rural libraries, found that “public library services are largely inadequate and ineffective in rural areas as their collection and services do not always meet the needs of the local residents” (p. 144). Lee (2014) described a “disconnect between teens and library culture” with barriers to service such as “poorly designed teen spaces…unappealing teen websites (and) teens’ lack of knowledge regarding library programs, services and collections” (Disconnect between teens and libraries, para. 2-3). In spite of the academic research, the Pew Research Center data shows that teens aged 16-17 actually have a favorable impression of libraries, with 95% finding them “important because they promote literacy and a love of reading” (p. 26), 94% valuing the public library providing “free access to materials and resources” (p. 27), and 90% feeling that a public library “improves the quality of life in a community” (p. 28). It will be of interest to see on which side of this debate Paso Robles teens fall.

In looking for local solutions for our lack of teen participation in the library, I looked at the Paso Robles City Library’s mission statement which defines the library as a “place to discover, to learn, and to grow” (http://www.prcity.com/government/departments/library/library_ about.asp), and our local teens should not be left out of that goal. Teens need to have a sense of place just as other age groups do, and much of the research on teens’ use of libraries bears this out. Lisa Wemett (2008) posits that the smallest rural library can have a designated area for teens, even if it must be shared with other age groups depending on the time of day. She presents various ways of separating/delineating the teen area with the use of color, lighting and furnishings. Evans (2014) also suggests that creating “ a friendly space for collaboration” (p. 13) will enhance the experience of teen information seekers. Agosto (2011) states that in addition to being an “information gateway,” the public library has two other purposes: to serve as “social interaction and entertainment spaces; and…beneficial physical environments” (Models of young adults’ information practices, para. 2).

Nearly all the articles cited in this review call for further studies to be completed regarding teens and their information seeking behavior in order to increase teens’ use of the library. Lee (2014) calls for further research to be done to bridge “the enduring gap in LIS literature” (Lack of research on teens and libraries, para. 1). In 2006, Agosto (as cited in Lee, 2014) is dismayed that “little youth-centered research exists that examines either the basic information-seeking behavior of teenagers, or reference and information services for young adults.” (Lack of research on teens and libraries, para. 3) Islam and Ahmed (2012) find that “more research is…needed to understand the information needs of rural dwellers in developed countries” (p. 144), showing the lack of research regarding the rural community as a whole. Clearly, there is demand for more information regarding the information needs of teens.

Conclusion

By researching the manner in which local college bound teens seek information for academic as well as everyday needs, I hope to find new ways to connect the library to them. In interviewing two local teens to test the waters, I found that they find information from many different sources, and they are not aware of the many services we offer including collections which can be accessed from home and teen programs here in the library. A survey of the larger high school college bound population will provide me with the ability to make changes to our service to this underserved population as well as find better ways to serve them in their information-seeking endeavors.

References

Agosto, D. E., & Hughes-Hassell, S. (2005). People, places, and questions: An investigation of the everyday life information-seeking behaviors of urban young adults. Library & Information Science Research, 27(2), 141–163. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.002

Agosto, D. E. (2012). Young Adults’ Information Behavior: What We Know So Far and Where We Need to Go From Here. Journal of Research on Libraries and Young Adults, 2(1).

Agosto, D. E. (2013). The big picture of YA services: Analyzing the results of the 2012 PLA PLDS survey. Young Adult Library Services, 11(3), 13-18.

Becker, C. H. (2009). Student values and research: Are Millennials really changing the future of reference and research?. Journal of Library Administration, 49(4), 341-364.

Dresang, E. T. (2005). The information-seeking behavior of youth in the digital environment. Library Trends, 54(2), 178-196.

Evans, A. (2014). How understanding teen brain development can help improve YA reference services. Young Adult Library Services, 12(3), 12-14.

Harlan, M. A., Bruce, C., & Lupton, M. (2012). Teen content creators: Experiences of using information to learn. Library Trends, 60(3), 569-587.

Islam, M. S., & Ahmed, S. Z. (2012). The information needs and information-seeking behaviour of rural dwellers: A review of research. IFLA Journal, 38(2), 137-147. doi: 10.1177/0340035212444513

Lee, S. A. (2014). Beyond Books, Nooks, and Dirty Looks: The History and Evolution of Library Services to Teens in the United States. Journal of Research on Libraries and Young Adults, 4(1).

Novotny, E. (2004). I don’t think I click: A protocol analysis study of use of a library online catalog in the Internet age. College & Research Libraries, 65(6), 525-537.

Pew Research Center (September 10, 2014). Younger Americans and public libraries: How those under 30 engage with libraries and think about libraries’ role in their lives and communities [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/09/10/ younger-americans-and-public-libraries/

Wemett, L. (2008). Teen space and the community’s living room: Incorporating teen areas into rural libraries. PNLA, 72(4), 13-18.

Annotated Bibliography

Agosto, D. E., & Hughes-Hassell, S. (2005). People, places, and questions: An investigation of the everyday life information-seeking behaviors of urban young adults. Library & Information Science Research, 27(2), 141–163. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.002

Denise E. Agosto, Associate Professor, College of Information Science and Technology at Drexel University and editor of the Journal of Research on Libraries and Young Adults and Sandra Hughes-Hassell, Professor, School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, are well-qualified to research and discuss information habits of young adults. This scholarly, peer-reviewed study has been cited in over one hundred twenty-five other publications, making it one of the definitive articles on the subject. In their study, twenty-seven urban teens were assessed in writing and group interviews to determine how they find information in their everyday lives. They found that urban teens generally prefer to seek information from people such as peers, teachers, and parents rather than librarians, and in fact see libraries in an unfavorable light. Agosto and Hughes-Hassell hope to inspire public librarians to create a more welcoming environment for these students in five ways: (1) by finding out the types of assignments the students are being given in school so librarians can “support the students in their academic pursuits” (p.162), (2) make teens materials collections more visible to teens who do visit the library, (3) use media such as telephones and computers to reach out to the teen population, (4) find ways for librarians to become part of the network of people teens consult for information, and (5) provide off-site library service, bringing the library to the teen. Although this work was written nearly ten years ago, public libraries are still experiencing many of these same issues as the data in a recent PEW research study (Pew Research Center, 2014) shows. What are not taken into account are the roles smart phones and social media play in the information-seeking habits of teens in 2014.

Agosto, D. E. (2012). Young Adults’ Information Behavior: What We Know So Far and Where We Need to Go From Here. Journal of Research on Libraries and Young Adults, 2(1).

Denise Agosto’s many written works about youth and their information seeking behaviors have been cited hundreds of times, making her one of the top scholars in her field. In this peer-reviewed article, Agosto touches on several aspects of teen information seeking, offering suggestions for improvement of service. She tells of several categories of information that teens regularly seek including popular culture, mental and physical health, relationships with peers and others, consumer and leisure interests, and academics including college and career information. She discusses the barriers that teens often face when seeking information in the library including: negative perceptions of libraries and librarians, and access issues similar to those faced by rural populations in the research of Islam and Ahmed (2012). Agosto discusses roles that public libraries can serve: “1) information gateways; 2) social interaction and entertainment spaces; and 3) beneficial physical environments.” Finally, the information behaviors of teens online are discussed. In each of these areas, Agosto offers a series of questions that should be asked if service is to improve.

Agosto, D. E. (2013). The big picture of YA services: Analyzing the results of the 2012 PLA PLDS survey. Young Adult Library Services, 11(3), 13-18.

The Public Library Association (PLA) has been surveying public libraries in the United States and Canada annually for nearly thirty years. Denise Agosto, Associate Professor in the College of Information Science and Technology at Drexel University and author of over one hundred written works on library service to children and teens, has evaluated the results of the 2012 survey in order to provide food for thought about the future of service to teens. Teens are still a somewhat underserved population in public libraries, with only one-third of all public libraries having a dedicated Young Adult specialist on staff, and many libraries, particularly small libraries, not having a separate space for their teen materials. While two-thirds of the libraries had designated space on their library webpages specifically for teens, under half had teen Facebook pages and under twenty percent used Twitter to communicate with their teen population. Most public libraries do have a good relationship with their local schools and community groups with teen members (like Girl Scouts). While this professional article provides useful recent data on all things “YA” the data presented by the PEW Research Center (2014) is both more current and more comprehensive.

Becker, C. H. (2009). Student values and research: Are Millennials really changing the future of reference and research?. Journal of Library Administration, 49(4), 341-364.

Charles Becker is the Library Director for the East Campus of Pima Community College. In his article for the peer-reviewed Journal of Library Administration, Becker explores how student values can influence research habits. Most Millennials, in his experience, start any search with Google because it is fast, easy, and usually provides a large number of results. When he discussed the importance of authority, most students did not feel this was important which Becker feels is a product of their age. “Choice” is one of the things Millennials value above all others, including “personalization, customization and instant gratification” (p.346). A second value is technology, but Becker’s peers have found that while students are adept at entertainment technology (social media, gaming, music, etc.), they are not so skilled at educational technology, in other words, they excel at the type of searching they need to do for everyday life information seeking as described by Agosto (2005), but may not be skilled at the type of technology skills they will need in the workforce. Becker also explored student library use, finding that they use the library because it is convenient and is conducive to studying. While Becker postulates on the value of libraries to Millennials (and beyond), he does not offer any good specific solutions to the problems of ease of use.

Dresang, E. T. (2005). The information-seeking behavior of youth in the digital environment. Library Trends, 54(2), 178-196.

Eliza Dresang, Professor in the College of Information at Florida State University, is most well-known for book Radical Change: Books for Youth in a Digital Age, which discusses how the reading experience for children is shifting due to interactive digital books and hypertext formats. In this peer-reviewed article, Dresang discusses how the theory of Radical Change affects the information-seeking behavior of youth. She postulates that because people seek answers in the easiest way possible and also have poorly developed information-seeking skills, they often miss out on information that would be of use to them. Dresang says that children adapt to technological radical change in information gathering fairly easily because they naturally read in a nonlinear manner so surfing the Internet is easy for them. A second aspect of information seeking that she notes is that children prefer to seek information in groups, looking for the social connection as well as the information being sought. Children become less marginalized in the online environment where they are allowed to freely express their opinions just as anyone else can. Youth also have access to more diverse subject matter. She states that brain research similar to that mentioned by Allyson Evans (2014) may shed even more light on the possibilities for youth seeking information.

Evans, A. (2014). How understanding teen brain development can help improve YA reference services. Young Adult Library Services, 12(3), 12-14.

In this brief but compelling professional article, Allyson Evans, YA Librarian and Manager of the YA Department at the Waldorf West Branch of the Charles County Public Library in Waldorf, Maryland, discusses how the brain development of teens affects their ability to access information. She explains that teens tend to rely on the amygdala of their brains because the frontal lobe is less developed, causing them to feel less secure and finding neutral or ambiguous communication to be perceived as negative or threatening. Evans then provides a synopsis of suggestions made during a discussion by members of YARS (Young Adult Reference Services Committee) at ALA Midwinter 2014. These suggestions fall into broad categories as outlined in YALSA’s Guidelines for Library Services to Teens (http://yalsa.ala.org/guidelines/ referenceguidelines.pdf) emphasizing the use of current technology being used by teens on a daily basis and providing information and materials appropriate to both educational and entertainment needs of teens. Like Novotny (2004), Evans recognizes that teens have both academic and leisure needs that could be met at the library, but Evans has access to the YALSA Guidelines that were adopted in March 2008 as a starting point.

Harlan, M. A., Bruce, C., & Lupton, M. (2012). Teen content creators: Experiences of using information to learn. Library Trends, 60(3), 569-587.

Mary Ann Harlan, Professor of Library and Information Science at San Jose State University, Christine Bruce, Professor at Queensland University of Technology, and Mandy Lupton, also of Queensland University of Technology, provide an excellent team for a discussion of where the Radical Change brought to light by Desang (2005) can lead. In this project, rural teen students were asked to use a variety of technological tools to help them learn to create and participate in an online community. They were asked to gather information and share it. “Serendipitous encounters” (p.573) occurred when students were inspired by information when they were not seeking it; this sometimes led them to seek more information on a topic. Focusing browsing was another way information was gathered; in this instance, students consciously look for information to inspire them, but are not looking for specific information. Direct Searching occurred when students needed to find specific information on a topic such as skill building to create content that matched their ideas. The students demonstrated particular thinking patterns as well including “choosing” a community in which to participate, “evaluating” the value of information based on its authority, “considering” information by collecting various samples of information to be inspired to make a particular thing, “planning” where the skills and tools to create were acquired, and “reflecting” where skills are refined in the creative process. Once the information is gathered, creating can occur. Teens “participated” in their chosen community by liking or commenting, “copied” techniques or skills they learned until they mastered them, “modeled” the technique to enhance what they liked about it, and finally “composed” their own creation.

Islam, M. S., & Ahmed, S. Z. (2012). The information needs and information-seeking behaviour of rural dwellers: A review of research. IFLA Journal, 38(2), 137-147. doi: 10.1177/0340035212444513

In this peer-reviewed literature review, Islam (University of Rajshahi) and Ahmed (University of Dhaka) examine how rural peoples in both developed and developing countries throughout the world find information. They discuss studies about the differences in the information resources available between urban and rural dwellers, and the different information needs these two groups have with a goal of identifying “some of the key issues and future research directions in this field” (p.138). Islam and Ahmed examine rural information needs in the United States, finding that information about practical topics such as parenting, job skills and personal finance and environmental concerns such a water quality and housing standards. Rural people in developed countries are concerned with the relevancy, timeliness, and quality of the information they receive. In developing countries, rural people have much more immediate needs for information: about food production (where does one buy seeds? What type of fertilizer should be used?), service professions such as clothing production, hair dressing, and construction trades, and health concerns (where is there safe drinking water? How does one prevent the flu?). They leave the reader with suggestions to provide better service to this population: design library service to meet specific needs of each community, provide the opportunity for the community to adopt new technologies, and recruit community volunteers to supplement staff support. While this literature review provided a general overview of studies of rural communities, it mainly focused on rural communities in developing countries, mainly in Asia, whose information needs are more at a subsistence level than most rural communities in the United States.

Lee, S. A. (2014). Beyond Books, Nooks, and Dirty Looks: The History and Evolution of Library Services to Teens in the United States. Journal of Research on Libraries and Young Adults, 4(1).

Assistant Professor in Library and Information Science, St. John’s University, in this peer-reviewed article, Shari Lee focuses on the history of the public library as a place to better the lives of the underserved as exemplified by the Boston Public Library’s original goal of “providing young people with the opportunity to ‘carry on their education’”  and the Public Library Association’s recommendation that public libraries look at their community and build services that meet their needs. Lee provides a history also of public library’s service to youth, from not allowing children under a certain age to be admitted to the present day when we try to provide teens with what they want. Teens and libraries have suffered a disconnect between what teens want (homework help, friendly spaces where they can study and socialize, access to technology) and what they often get (unfriendly librarians, unwelcoming spaces). She concludes that public libraries are in a position to turn this situation around by focusing on the teen as a whole person, rather than on the traditional services provided. It is unfortunate that Lee did not include any specific ideas for improvement as Agosto (2005) did.

Novotny, E. (2004). I don’t think I click: A protocol analysis study of use of a library online catalog in the Internet age. College & Research Libraries, 65(6), 525-537.

Eric Novotny, Humanities Librarian at the Pennsylvania State University Libraries, performed a protocol analysis study to examine how college-aged students perform searches using a library online catalog. Students spoke out loud and were recorded as they conducted each step of a series of directed searches. Researchers evaluated the data collected with an eye toward improving their web screens for ease of use. Users were divided into two groups, novice and advanced (basically representing new and returning students), based on their prior experience with the online catalog. They were surprised to find that both groups were rather naïve in their searching skills, sticking with phrases with no Boolean operators. Not only did they fail to use Boolean searching, but they performed poorly at using synonyms to conduct another phrase search. Searchers also failed to explore the search screen for helpful hints, instead accomplishing their task as quickly as possible. This theme of the necessity of ease of use comes up over and over again in information seeking literature. Charles Becker (2009) and Eliza Dresang (2005) also explore this concept is their studies of teen information seeking. Where Novotny’s study differs is in the attitudes of his users; he found that these students already believed that they are proficient at searching (p.530). Also of interest in the protocol study is the concept of Internet searching versus library catalog searching: in Internet searching, typing in more information often gives the searcher a better result; in catalog searching, keywords and Boolean searching work best. In his study, Novotny found four areas for improvement of the online catalog: inclusion of summaries and tables of contents similar to looking at selections in Amazon, relevancy rankings and exact title matching to decrease the confusion experienced by searchers, “find related” suggestions similar to those in Amazon, and context-sensitive and interactive help so patrons can get help with their exact search (p.532-533). It is of interest to note that although this peer-reviewed article was written ten years ago, librarians are still struggling to have online catalogs operate in the same manner as popular websites such as Google or Amazon.

Pew Research Center (September 10, 2014). Younger Americans and public libraries: How those under 30 engage with libraries and think about libraries’ role in their lives and communities [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/09/10/younger-americans-and-public-libraries/

According to pewresearch.org, The Pew Research Center, a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, is an organization who provides “numbers, facts and trends shaping the world” (according to their masthead) by conducting public opinion polls, researching demographics, and the like. They do not take policy positions, preferring instead to let the results of their research speak for themselves. The two primary researchers for this data file are Kathryn Zickuhr, a graduate student and Associate Researcher for the Internet Project and Lee Rainie, Director of Internet, Science, and Technology Research. Rainie in particular is an expert in his field consulted by various news media about technology trends. Although this report is not peer-reviewed, it is scholarly in nature. This study gathers data about three groups of young adults, “high schoolers (ages 16-17)…college-aged (18-24)…and a third generation is 25-29” (p.1) and their information gathering habits, focusing on their use of technology and the library. Data was collected on reading habits of these groups as compared to older age groups as well as their relationship with their local public library. In looking at the potentially college-bound teen population the research showed some compelling data regarding teens’ use of the library with the majority of them having a library card (67%) and using the library within the past year (65%) (p.15). Although they are using the library, the majority of the high school age group are not very familiar with library services, something that my own interviews with rural college-bound teens confirms. Unlike in the Agosto findings from 2005, the Pew data finds that high schoolers find the library a “nice, pleasant space to be” (p.20). Zickuhr and Rainie also polled the under-30 group about the importance of library services and found that under half of those polled found many of the services to be important with one exception – that the library is a “quiet, safe place” (p.22). Although this work is current, the focus is on a large population – Americans under 30 years old – and the data may not apply to my much smaller focus group.

Wemett, L. (2008). Teen space and the community’s living room: Incorporating teen areas into rural libraries. PNLA, 72(4), 13-18.

Wemett serves as the Assistant Director for reference and teen Services at the Webster Public Library in New York, and here discusses the concept of the library as the “community’s living room,” meaning a place that has many uses and is available to all ages. She discusses how, especially for small rural libraries, the space must serve many purposes from gathering place for community members to children’s playroom, to home office, to program room. In looking at a way to fit teens into this picture, Wemett examines possible activities that would occur in the designated teen area including: home work space; a space with technology for listening, viewing, or reading; or a place to meet with friends (hang out). She discusses possible furnishings for the area as well as the use of light and color. To make the space truly a teen area, furniture may need to be arranged in a manner that helps establish a special “zone” with signage that stands out from the rest of the library space. Visual interest is also recommended and can be achieved with artwork or interactive displays such as magnetic poetry sets. A well-designed space for teens would definitely aide in changing the negative perception of libraries as noted by Agosto (2005), who had teens describe them as “dirty, unwelcoming, and unexciting” (p. 151) and Lee (2014) who noticed a disconnect between teens and libraries. It is not known if this article is peer-reviewed; according to their website (http://www.pnla.org/quarterly), PNLA Quarterly “publishes both peer-reviewed and high-quality non-peer-reviewed articles.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s